The defendants’ appeals are denied and dismissed, the judgments appealed from are sustained, and the cases are remitted to the Superior Court for further proceedings. Lowell is a working class mill town located in the northeastern section of Massachusetts. Massachusetts. In Hells Angels lore, the murders became known as the Lennoxville Purge. Massachusetts graves tell history of HAMC LOWELL, Mass. 917, 918 (R.I. 1928). But this court has long held that a photograph of a murder victim is admissible so long as it is competent evidence which reasonably tends to prove or disprove some material fact in issue, provided it is not offered for the sole purpose of arousing the passions of the jury. As part of a series of plea bargains, the clubhouse was demolished last year. 2d 495 (1972); Preston v. State, 492 P.2d 376, 379-80 (Okla. Crim. SHAMROCKS81 MERRIMACK VALLEY, LOWELL MASSACHUSETTS 01852 The defendants have failed to establish that this result would follow. May 6, 2018 - Doesn’t Everyone Know RED/WHITE Is The BEST In The (WORLD). list of Outlaw Motorcycle Club Court Records, Hells Angels Court Record – USA vs. Gerald Franklin Smith (1971), Outlaws Court Record – Piscottano v. Murphy (2004). State v. Vaccaro, 111 R.I. 59, 64-65, 298 A.2d 788, 791 (1973); see also G.L. HELLS ANGELS®, HAMC®, and the Death Heads (winged skull logos)® are trademarks owned by Hells Angels Motorcycle Corporation, registered and/or applications pending in the United States, Europe, China and many other countries. App. Gli Hell's Angels (formalmente Hells Angels Motorcycle Club - HAMC, letteralmente "club motociclistico angeli dell'inferno") è un club di motociclisti nato negli Stati Uniti d'America diffuso in tutto il mondo, i cui membri, tradizionalmente, utilizzano motociclette Harley-Davidson. State v. Costa, 111 R.I. 602, 306 A.2d 36 (1973); State v. Kozukonis, 100 R.I. 298, 303, 214 A.2d 893, 897 (1965). at 615, 85 S. Ct. at 1233, 14 L. Ed. LOWELL, Mass. Hells Angels Lowell chapter members Elbert Bowden Jr. (Spooky), Donald James Picard (Skeets) and another member known as Mule arrive and begin questioning the man. No. After not providing sufficient answers he is then beaten by the 3 Hells Angels along with other men who are also present before being taken away, alive, in a Cadillac. Moreover, an expression by a prosecutor of his belief in defendants’ guilt is not improper so long as it appears that the belief is premised upon evidence to be presented, rather than upon knowledge of facts which will not be offered as evidence. Whether that foundation was established was a matter for the trial justice’s sound judicial discretion. Some of them have grown older and more interested in running legitimate businesses than raising hell on their Harleys, he said. En route to Providence, Bowden stopped the Ford and talked to Rose, who returned with “Doc” proceeded to parking lot to search for certain missing items. Less than two years after an especially vile group of Hells Angels was driven from their clubhouse, the outlaw motorcycle gang has opened a hangout next to a peaceful, middle-class neighborhood. That being so, there was no reason for the rule in Bruton to be applied. An ECMF member then “* * * asked permission of the Angels if he could get a piece of the action.” Permission was granted, and the ECMF members joined in the beating. Massachusetts graves tell history of HAMC LOWELL, Mass. Asst. He has gone to the building department and City Hall to demand they qualify for every permit they need. A second argument concerns the testimony of a Registry of Motor Vehicles inspector who was called as a defense witness. And in 2013, several members of the Hells Angels and Red Devils biker gangs in Massachusetts were charged with federal kidnapping, mayhem, and extortion counts. State v. Belu, 141 A. On their return, Picard told Mulhern that he was not a member of the Hell’s Angels. Medical examination showed that death was due to blunt forces applied to various parts of the body and not to drowning. Hells Angels were looking for missing Mashpee man prior to disappearance, investigating police told Updated Jan 07, 2019; Posted Dec 12, 2017 Raymond Perry, missing since Dec. 1(Facebook) We agree with defendants that the trial justice misconceived the thrust of the principles permitting the use of evidence of prior inconsistent statements for impeachment when he ruled that Russo could not quote Rose, and limited him to contradicting only what Rose had testified he said to Russo about the crimes and then only in general terms. The defendants contend that under these principles it was error to admit photographs depicting the victim’s” corpse. The first of these is defendants’ assertion that it was error to deny their motions for directed verdicts on all indictments. For retired Massachusetts State Police detective Bob Long, the Texas incident triggered memories from the 1970s of the Lowell Hells Angels and its violent past. View our list of Outlaw Motorcycle Club Court Records. State v. Carufel, 106 R.I. 739, 742, 263 A.2d 686, 687-88 (1970). 2d 761, 781, 457 P.2d 841, 853-54, 80 Cal. Every spring, the two dozen or so members of the Lowell Hells Angels Motorcycle Club, all wearing leather jackets adorned with club-logo patches or "colors," roar into Westview Cemetery on Harley Davidson motorcycles to pay homage to six fallen comrades. That argument, it seems to us, extends the Reardon rule well beyond its outer limits by seeking to exclude competent evidence which has a natural tendency to establish the facts in controversy merely because it might arouse feelings of indignation in the jury. The arguments in this grouping focus on the rule that otherwise relevant evidence should not be considered by a jury if its probative value is clearly outweighed by a likelihood of undue prejudice. Another assignment of error is to admitting as exhibits a blood-stained automobile seat and a floor mat taken from the Cadillac in which Mulhern was allegedly transported from Bristol to Providence. Clearly without merit is the defendants’ final contention that the trial justice erred when he honored two requests from the jury to repeat that portion of his charge wherein he defined murder and its various degrees. ``The neighbors were pretty upset.″, As one homeowner, speaking on condition of anonymity, put it: ``As soon as the Hells Angels signs went up, this property right here dropped 20 grand.″. What is required instead is that each of the challenged comments be viewed in the context in which it appears and in the light of the attendant circumstances. One of those comments was merely the prosecutor’s explanation of why he did not offer to introduce into evidence a sworn statement which Rose made shortly after the murder. Picard, Bowden, and “Mule” then left in the Ford, followed by Mulhern, Harris, and the two others in the Cadillac, and by “Doc” Bergeron and Rose on their motorcycles. For retired Massachusetts State Police detective Bob Long, the Texas incident triggered memories from the 1970s of the Lowell Hells Angels and its violent past. 2d 622 (1971); People v. Schader, 71 Cal. In pointing out that such a change was more likely to be made by “motorcycle nuts” than by another class of operators,[4] the prosecutor was merely expressing an opinion which the jury might also reach on the admitted facts in the cases. The photographs which were admitted as exhibits, while gruesome, assisted in establishing the corpse as Mulhern’s. [2] An example of that find of statement is: “You will learn also, Mr. Foreman and ladies and gentlemen, that Mulhern was placed in one of those automobiles and transported to Providence and was beaten at least part of the way back.”, [3] “He [defense counsel] makes issue out of the fact why didn’t the State introduce this exhibit; because if I had even attempted to, he would have jumped up through the ceiling.”, [4] “We are not dealing with people that belong to AAA. One need not be a lexicographer to comprehend that the prosecutor, in effect, used the word “learn” as a synonym for the word “hear,” which even defendants agree would have been a permissible substitute. In Richard (“Moose”) Harris’ blue Cadillac convertible were Harris and two other ECMF members; in a maroon Ford were three members of the Hell’s Angels from Lowell, known to Rose as “Skeets” (Picard), “Spooky” (Bowden), and “Mule.” Both defendants had long hair and beards, they were attired in riding clothes and Hell’s Angels-type jackets, and “Spooky” had a Hell’s Angels emblem tattooed on his forehead. Others don’t see what all the fuss is about. State v. Kozukonis, supra 100 R.I. at 304, 214 A.2d at 897. Nothing in the facts of these cases persuades us that we should hold otherwise. To the people who had shown the support to the Red and White family of 81 I would love to say that we as family have to stick by each other through the darkest days of our time in life Commonwealth v. Torrealba, 316 Mass. Sometime after 8 o’clock, “Doc” Bergeron, a friend of Rose’s, arrived on his motorcycle with Mulhern, known to Rose as “Lucifer,” and they joined the other two in the tap. At the trial, which took place over more than six weeks, the state’s key witness was Richard Rose. The defendants made those motions at the conclusion of the state’s case without having first rested their cases, and under the practice then in effect in this state, exceptions did not lie to those rulings. ``They haven’t said anything, they haven’t done anything.″. The remaining four contentions advanced by defendants as grounds for reversal may be summarily rejected. His body is found 4 days later in the Providence River. Both Rose and another witness observed that some of the three persons in the Cadillac made “punching motions” where Mulhern was sitting, but did not see where the blows were landing. 73-70-C. A. This court record relates to the appeal of Elbert Bowden Jr. who had been convicted along with Donald James Picard, both were members of the Hells Angels Motorcycle Club, of the kidnapping and manslaughter of Dennis Joseph Mulhern. State v. Turcotte, 68 R.I. 119, 122, 26 A.2d 625, 627 (1942); State v. Durkee, 68 R.I. 73, 77, 26 A.2d 604, 607 (1942); State v. Mariano, 37 R.I. 168, 182-83, 91 A. This is so because defendants in their brief do not tell us where in the record we can find offers of proof which in reasonably specific terms would now provide us with a clear picture of what it was they intended to prove. Without that knowledge, it is impossible for us to determine whether the comments were unrelated to the evidence or totally extraneous to the issues in the cases and therefore objectionable. Before us, defendants argue that these extrajudicial utterances were not admissions, were not relevant to the issues because of remoteness, and, although not articulated in so many words, were therefore inadmissible as hearsay. Supreme Court of Rhode Island. ``They support Little League,″ Ellis said. Each defendant was convicted of kidnaping and manslaughter and, following denial of their motions for new trials, both were sentenced to the Adult Correctional Institutions. State v. Danahey, 108 R.I. 291, 300-01, 274 A.2d 736, 741 (1971); State v. Winston, 105 R.I. 447, 450-51, 252 A.2d 354, 356-57 (1969). Although by then it appeared to be one of a much older and heavier person, the body was identified as Mulhern’s. It seems to us, therefore, that while their probative value may not have been substantial, the exhibits furnished a link in the chain of circumstances tying defendants to the crime. The first of those comments occurred during the prosecutor’s opening statement, when he several times said to the jury, “You will learn” and then referred to the matters he intended to prove. 1971). Moreover, any possible undue prejudice arising from the comment was cured when, on the following day, the trial justice told the jury that the comment was inappropriate and should be disregarded. When later during cross-examination the prosecutor asked whether defendants had subpoenaed the registry records of Harris, the defendants objected and moved to pass the cases. Certainly, what was said does not fairly imply that defense counsel hindered the production of evidence. In addition, we are unable to perceive how advising the jury of the presence of aliases in the indictments was prejudicial, particularly inasmuch as defendants and most of the other participants in these offenses were known by such aliases as “Skeets,” “Spooky,” “Mule,” “Moose,” and the like. The Hells Angels are the most significant motorcycle gang involved in drug trafficking in Massachusetts. [1] Following the defendants’ convictions and the filing of their notices of intention to prosecute bills of exceptions, Rule 4(b) of our rules became effective. Last year, two members admitted they were involved in killing a member of a rival motorcycle gang by ramming his motorcycle with a Cadillac. Gen., Donald P. Ryan, Asst. (AP) _ In this tough town, nicknamed the City of Sin, it’s the Angels that strike fear in the hearts of folks. SAN FRANCISCO (AP) _ Thirty-eight members of the Hells Angels in five states were arrested Tuesday in an undercover investigation involving drugs, weapons, explosives and conspiracy to murder members of a rival gang, the Justice Department said. That request was made for the purpose of verifying a witness’ prior testimony that he had seen a tattoo of the Hell’s Angels emblem on Bowden’s forehead. hells angels, hells angels cape cod, hells angels worcester, hells angels worcester ma, hells angels worcester massachusetts, hells angels worcester massachusetts chapter, massachusetts biker gangs, massachusetts motorcycle clubs, massachusetts motorcycle gang list, massachusetts motorcycle gangs, motorcycle clubs in massachusetts, … Brown, who was the president of the Hells Angels, and Avelis wanted to meet him at a Dunkin’ Donuts on Route 1 in Saugus. Soon thereafter, two automobiles pulled into a parking lot across the street from the tap. STATE v. Elbert V. BOWDEN, Jr. and Donald James Picard. 233, 237, 160 A. ``None of us have any problems,″ said Carol Barker, who lives in the Goldfish Pond neighborhood near the Angels’ new building. [5] Such an instruction is required when the evidence is entirely circumstantial. The Hells Angels are a California-based club and considered a staple in the darker side of West Coast pop culture. They cite Griffin v. California, 380 U.S. 609, 85 S. Ct. 1229, 14 L. Ed. State v. Fortes, 110 R.I. 406, 293 A.2d 506 (1972); State v. Montella, 88 R.I. 469, 476, 149 A.2d 919, 922-23 (1959); State v. Di Noi, 59 R.I. 348, 368, 195 A. In those circumstances, they argue, their request for a severance should have been granted under the rule announced in Bruton v. United States, 391 U.S. 123, 88 S. Ct. 1620, 20 L. Ed. Two Hells Angels were accused of raping a woman at the compound during the 1997 funeral of a former chapter leader, a brawling ex-con named Alan ``Big Al″ Hogan. The defendants argue that such admissions opened the door to jury speculation of a possible connection between the exhibits and the victim’s death. In these circumstances, we treat their notices of intention to prosecute bills of exceptions as notices of appeal. Atty. To determine whether the evidence in a given case has that effect requires an examination of its substance and the facts attendant upon its admission, and an evaluation of its probable influence upon the outcome of the case. Leader of Salem Hells Angels Pleads Guilty to Federal Crimes in Connection With Brutal Assault - Salem, MA - Marc Eliason, 37, of Lynn; Robert DeFronzo, 47, of … È considerata un'organizzazione criminale dal Dipartimento di Giustizia degli Stati Uniti d'America. State v. Peters, 82 R.I. 292, 296, 107 A.2d 428, 430 (1954). [3] While the language used in that explanation perhaps was not as restrained as it might have been, who can say that the prosecutor’s assessment of how defense counsel would have reacted is unrealistic? State v. Almeida, 111 R.I. 566, 570, 304 A.2d 895, 897-98 (1973). OFF THE WIRE By Robin Kaminski / The Daily Item This is the latest in a series of cold case stories in Lynn. This list has been compiled based on data from the Hells Angels Motorcycle Club website. Grant Co., 110 R.I. 523, 531, 294 A.2d 201, 205 (1972); Manning v. Redevelopment Agency, 103 R.I. 371, 378-80, 238 A.2d 378, 382-83 (1968). Last year, two members admitted they were involved in killing a member of a rival motorcycle gang by ramming his motorcycle with a Cadillac. Their failure to support that argument either in their brief or in oral argument with any analysis, discussion, or citation of authority is sufficient ground for its rejection. The club has established chapters in Lowell, Lynn, Salem, Cape Cod (headquartered in Buzzards Bay) and Berkshire County (headquartered in Lee). '” State v. Reardon, supra at 25, 219 A.2d at 771-72. Enos v. W.T. August 16, 1974. They plan to keep operating a machine shop and to manufacture Hells Angels T-shirts for sale at their store, Red and White Fashions, on the city’s waterfront boulevard, Sachar said. Finally, defendant Bowden argues that his case should have been passed because of the passion and prejudice engendered in the minds of the jury when, at the state’s request, he was required to bare his forehead. No copying of the Death Heads or any content here is permitted. We are dealing with motorcycle nuts. Their three-story clubhouse, guarded by pit bulls and video cameras mounted on poles, had a sign that read: ``Is there life after death? In the circumstances, the admission of the photographs was not an abuse of discretion. *634 Richard J. Israel, Atty. [2] While defendants agree that these statements would have been within permissible bounds had the verb “hear” been substituted for “learn,” they argue that the use of the latter carried with it the connotation that the facts had already been proved, and that the *636 prosecutor’s opening, instead of serving to prepare the jurors’ minds for the evidence to be presented, conveyed the impression that he believed defendants were guilty. Here, during several days’ immersion in the river, the victim’s features had become distorted and his appearance altered. Further motions to pass the cases were made when the prosecutor included in his opening statement a reading of the indictments, which referred to each defendant as “alias, John Doe.” While defendants argue that this was reason for passing the cases, they do not indicate either by argument, analysis, or citation of authority how those references contributed to their convictions. That, he said, would provide the jury with “a hearsay version of how this offense was committed,” and tend to confuse it. They were joined in the parking lot by those in the bar. *640 Another assignment of error is to the rulings permitting Rose to testify (1) that Picard, in Bowden’s absence, told him “that he would get me [Rose] and my whole family” if he testified to the contents of a statement he had given the police, and (2) that Bowden, in Picard’s absence, told him that “* * * he was trying to recall different dates where he had been so he would be able to establish an alibi for July the 6th.”. State v. Patriarca, 112 R.I. 14, 43, 308 A.2d 300, 317 (1973). In a comparable situation, the Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts held that absent a request for a limiting instruction, it was not error to read to the jury an indictment containing ten aliases, only one of which was subsequently proved. 2d 106 (1965), as authority for their contention that it was error to deny that motion. Massachusetts graves tell history of HAMC . The Angels’ lawyer, Bruce Sachar, said members had no comment. Next is the defendants’ contention that it was error not to have instructed the jury that in determining guilt or innocence, they had to find that all of the facts and circumstances necessary to prove the crime charged had been established beyond a reasonable doubt, and that taken together those facts and circumstances were consistent with the inference of defendants’ guilt and at the same time were inconsistent with any reasonable hypothesis of their innocence.[5]. He said they intend to obey the law in their new home, down to getting zoning board and building department approvals. As Rose related, he and another member of the East Coast Motorcycle Federation (ECMF) were in Denny’s Tap in Bristol on the evening of July 6, 1970. The Hells Angels are bringing crystal meth to Massachusetts. HELLS ANGELS®, HAMC®, and the Death Heads (winged skull logos)® are trademarks owned by Hells Angels Motorcycle Corporation, registered and/or applications pending in the United States, Europe, China and many other countries. SALEM — A man reputed to be the “sergeant at arms,” or enforcer, for the North Shore chapter of the Hells Angels motorcycle gang was sentenced to state prison Thursday The defendants argue that the prosecutor in some of his comments to the jury went beyond the limits of his assigned role and became a heated partisan more interested in obtaining convictions than in seeing that justice was done; that those comments so exceeded permissible bounds that they could not be cured by cautionary instructions; and that in those circumstances it was error for the trial justice not to grant their resulting motions to pass the cases. Rptr. 497, 506 (1937); see State v. Rose, 112 R.I. 402, 311 A.2d 281, 283-84 (1973). Without such an offering we obviously are not in a position to determine whether the excluded evidence would have so added to the effect and the weight of the already admitted impeaching testimony that it might reasonably have altered the result of these cases and have caused the jury to return not guilty verdicts. Finally, there is the prosecutor’s closing argument, during which he made allegedly abusive remarks concerning defendants and their attorneys. Hells Angels Lowell chapter members Elbert Bowden Jr. (Spooky), Donald James Picard (Skeets) and another member known as Mule arrive and begin questioning the man. denied, 400 U.S. 1009, 91 S. Ct. 569, 27 L. Ed. United States v. Middlebrooks, 431 F.2d 299, 301 (5th Cir.1970), cert. Support Your Local Hells Angels Motorcycle Club with this Original Hells Angels Support81 Camouflage T-Shirt T-Shirts and all gear from www.support81.es are Original and Authorised Hells Angels MC Support merchandise Officially Licensed Merchandise such as T-Shirts, Tank Tops, Hoodies etc. 2d 209 (1966): “`Evidence having a natural tendency to establish the facts in controversy should be admitted; competent evidence may not be excluded merely because it might arouse feelings of horror or indignation in the jury; questions as to the character of the evidence offered, and the manner and extent of its presentation, are largely within the discretion of the Trial Court, and the exercise of that discretion will not be interfered with unless there has been an abuse to the prejudice of the defendant * * *. Two Hells Angels were accused of raping a woman at the compound during the 1997 funeral of a former chapter leader, a brawling ex-con named Alan ``Big Al″ Hogan. For retired Massachusetts State Police detective Bob Long, the Texas incident triggered memories from the 1970s of the Lowell Hells Angels and its violent past. The tactics utilized by the Hells Angels in a state trial in Toledo, Ohio, in October, 1982, best illustrate the pattern which has emerged. LYNN, Mass. State v. Reardon, 101 R.I. 18, 24-26, 219 A.2d 767, 771-72 (1966). You are looking at a very rare vintage sterling silver biker ring. ``They were good neighbors when they were on Shaw Court,″ Sachar said. In that case the court held that the fifth amendment, as made obligatory upon the states by the fourteenth amendment, “* * * forbids either comment by the prosecution on the accused’s silence or instructions by the court that such silence is evidence of guilt.” Id. The defendants argue eleven issues, which for convenience may be grouped into three categories: (1) comments by the prosecutor which defendants assert required the trial justice to pass the cases, (2) rulings permitting the introduction of evidence whose potential for prejudicing and inflaming the jurors allegedly outweighed its probative force, and (3) miscellaneous matters consisting of evidentiary rulings, instructions to the jury, and a denial of their motions for directed verdicts. 1956 (1969 Reenactment) § 9-17-14. This they should have done. 21, 27 (1914). In those circumstances, defendants have no just cause for complaint. Beyond that, however, there can be no serious question that on the record each of those statements was voluntarily made; that although not amounting to confessions, they were evidence which, when considered together with other evidence and the surrounding circumstances, yielded to inferences of guilt; and that they therefore were not barred by the hearsay rule. State v. Colavecchio, 111 R.I. 428, 431-32, 303 A.2d 760, 762 (1973); State v. Kozukonis, 71 R.I. 456, 460-61, 46 A.2d 865, 867-68 (1946). This large ring says Free Lowell and that refers to lowell Massachusetts. See Morgan v. Washington Trust Co., 105 R.I. 13, 26-27, 249 A.2d 48, 55-56 (1969). It provided a vehicle for discrediting Rose’s testimony, which directly involved these defendants in the offenses charged, and it made possible the introduction of pretrial statements made by him which, if offered as credible testimonial assertions, would have been rejected as obnoxious to the hearsay rule. 24, 25-26, 54 N.E.2d 939, 940-41 (1944). Every spring, the two dozen or so members of the Lowell Hells Angels Motorcycle Club, all wearing leather jackets adorned with club-logo patches or "colors," roar into Westview Cemetery on Harley Davidson motorcycles to pay homage to six fallen comrades. Initially defendants contend that the trial justice unduly restricted their attempts to impeach Richard Rose, the state’s primary witness, with evidence of prior inconsistent statements allegedly made during conversations with one Vito Russo, a fellow inmate at the Adult Correctional Institutions and a “jailhouse lawyer.” Rose was questioned by defendants during cross-examination about those conversations, and later they called Russo as their witness. State v. Tella, R.I., n. 1, 321 A.2d 87-88 n. 1. The defendants also argue that the cases should have been passed because during his summation to the jury the prosecutor stated that “These guys have broken the code” and that their counsel “planned trickery and deceit.” The difficulty we have in giving any weight to these contentions is that they are unaccompanied by either a transcript of the prosecutor’s closing argument or any argument from counsel advising us of the context in which the offending remarks were made. (1974). ``We’re not happy about them being there,″ said Gerard Dwan, president of the Goldfish Pond Neighborhood Association. Hells Angels emissaries stripped bare the Laval clubhouse and the homes of each dead man. The ring looks like it was sized at one point and also had some home done sizing as you see they took out some of the size out of the inside of the ring with a file. Every spring, the two dozen or so members of the Lowell Hells Angels Motorcycle Club, all wearing leather jackets adorned with club-logo patches or "colors," roar into Westview Cemetery on Harley Davidson motorcycles to pay homage to six fallen comrades. He then struck Mulhern and knocked him down, whereupon the three Hell’s Angels started beating, kicking, and stomping him. Mulhern was wearing a Hell’s Angel patch on his jacket. City Councilor David Ellis saids the Hells Angels never left Lynn, a city of about 80,000 just north of Boston that is plagued by drugs, gang violence and arson. If these conditions are satisfied, it is of no concern that a photograph may be unpleasant to view or that it may have an influence beyond the strict limits of the purpose for which it was introduced. Heuser v. Goldstein, 107 R.I. 317, 321-22, 267 A.2d 420, 422-23 (1970). No precise formula is available for making that determination. Atty. And there is no representation in these cases that the facts which the prosecutor told the jury they would “learn” would not be offered as evidence. While Levasseur was transported to the Lowell police station to provide a statement, he said that the younger Dubey drove back to Cote’s Market and waited for other Hells Angels to show up. The witness Rose did, after all, testify that he had attempted to remove all traces of blood from the seat of the Cadillac in which the victim, while bleeding, had been transported to Providence. The question that remains is whether these general principles were misapplied in these cases. State witness Richard Rose and another man went to a bar on 6 July, 1970 to find him in order to present him to members of the Lowell chapter of the Hells Angels, who had some questions about his alleged membership in the club. 2d 908 (1966), clearly forecloses that assertion. This isn’t just a few bad members. Whether there is any merit to those contentions depends upon whether the allegedly offensive remarks were so flagrantly impermissible that even the cautionary instructions which were given were insufficient to assure defendants the fair and impartial trial which was their due. *637 The other of those comments was the prosecutor’s response to defense counsel’s argument that Rose should not be believed because he testified to a change of drivers in the Cadillac while it was going 45 to 50 miles an hour.